Pat Tillman Essay

Circumstance Analysis of Tillman Story Stephen Stone Black Sheep, Tillman’s company, needed to make it to Mana on schedule. In any case, they had an inoperable vehicle with them that needed to take back to the FOB, forward working base. Odd one out couldn't forsake the vehicle. There just reasonable alternative was to carry it to a close by cleared thruway for a wrecker to get it. Fortunately, they went over a nearby who could tow it to the interstate. Be that as it may, they ran into an another problem.Whether to part the gathering or not; Either have the entire unit escort the neighborhood to the thruway, split the detachment and have one half escort the nearby while the other half proceeded with the strategic, let the nearby tow only it. Dark Sheep’s pioneers concurred that parting the company would be welcoming pointless threat and permitting the neighborhood to tow the vehicle alone was not even conceivable. In any case, the request descended from higher that the u nit would be part so as to remain on time. Odd one out was part into two gatherings, Serial 1 and Serial 2.Serial 2 will accompany the nearby while Serial 1 proceeds with the mission. During this time, there were a few miscommunications among home office and the detachment. Sequential 2’s unique way was a troublesome and unforgiving landscape. The neighborhood offered a simpler and snappy way that Serial 2’s pioneer settled upon. The nearby took the front of the escort and drove Serial 2 along the recently chosen way. Be that as it may, they happened upon circuitous fire, which was later, recognize as mortar fire. The nearby halted and sought shelter, which brought about obstructing the guard on the tight segment of pass.Serial 2’s individuals needed to compel the driver to drive so as to the caravan out of the threat zone. Sequential 1 heard the firefight close to Serial 2 and went towards it to give fire. In any case, interchanges between Serial 1 and Serial 2 was never settled during the occupant firefight. As Serial 1’s individuals got into position, Serial 2 erroneously Serial 1 as hostiles. During the firefight, Serial 1 was locked in with the PID, positive ID, of the adversary while getting out truce towards Serial 2.While from the start, Serial 2 was locked in with who they accepted was the foe. Joined to Serial 1 was an AMF, afghan military power, trooper, who wasn’t appropriately advised upon to the unit. Sequential 2 mixed up the AMF warrior as an adversary and Serial 1 individuals close to him as hostiles, despite the fact that, neither Serial 1 part or AMF trooper were wearing the conventional uniform of the foe and wearing US Army uniform. Tillman’s bunch was fire upon and hit. The vast majority of the company was stun by the firefight.It took a couple of moment before Serial 2 perceived the truce and the fallout, wherein they called for help. Odd one out had two slaughtered in real life, KIA, and not man y harmed from the firefight basically because of the amicable flames. One of the contributing components to the passings in Black Sheep was the leaderships’ dedication to remaining on time. Administration constantly penance ranger’s favorable circumstances fighting to make up lose time and get back on time. The initiative didn’t give their men sufficient opportunity to get ready for the mission or if nothing else appropriately short their squad.For model, the AMF trooper should be acquaint with the unit, so benevolent fire would not fall upon him as it did. The one of rangers’ norms of activity, SOP, is to work around evening time so as to give them the preferred position over the foe. Around evening time, officer has an immense favorable position over the adversary through innovation means and night removes a large portion of the control from foe with side of the road bombs. Be that as it may, during the daytime, the foe has a simple perception of US mil itary and ideal control of their utilization of side of the road bombs and extemporizes unstable gadgets, IEDs.I would have further defer the company to give the unit time to brief. I would have adhered to the SOP and utilized the pretenses of night to move out. One of the fundamental contributing elements for the result was correspondence. Correspondence between the unit and base camp, correspondence among crews, and interchanges inside the crews had a few defects. Home office didn’t build up appropriately with the detachment. Central station didn’t take any of the proposal or sentiments from the company chiefs into record and adhered to their schedule.Also, base camp didn’t explain on specific things nor didn’t the detachment ensure the aim of authority with things, for example, the course to the roadway. Interchanges between crews were made rushed or were rarely settled. During the firefight, the radio was packed with Serial 2 taking to comprehend the circumstance so correspondence between Serial 1 and 2 was rarely settled. Because of the commotion from the firefight and time of day, verbal and visual correspondence for truce and indications of benevolent was not set up in time. Correspondence inside crews was never appropriately established.If there was legitimate channels built up, the radio may had been less packed permitting space for Serial 1 to build up correspondence. Additionally, PIDs may have been appropriately settled if correspondence was set up with the crews. Because of the need correspondence with Serial 2, there was no PID on the adversary, where Tillman was at, yet Serial 2 kept on terminating. I would’ve again considered more opportunity to the unit to build up as well as go over the conventions to utilize the radios, if the radio goes down, tokens of rules of commitment, to pose inquiries, and such.The need time and rushed development add to the breakdown of correspondence which enflame the chaos that en compassed the firefight. I would have penance the time so as to not send my detachment into pointless risk. Armed force doesn’t need to connect with a foe on the off chance that we don’t not have an overpower advantage. We would prefer not to set up ourselves for disappointment. Be that as it may, when the authority of Black Sheep didn’t give sufficient opportunity to company to plan and removed different favorable circumstances of the officers so as to remain on time. The authority was setting up the officers for disappointment.

To Err is Human by Lewis Thomas

Lewis Thomas' To Err is Human In the exposition, â€Å"To Err is Human†, Lewis Thomas, starts by differentiating the alleged reliability of PCs with the human penchant for blunder. In the exposition Lewis clarifies how we develop from our missteps, he says â€Å"We are worked to commit errors, coded for blunder (306). Lewis utilizes convincing components to influence individuals into his place of view.Thomas composes that when PCs make a blunder, they don't have the foggiest idea what to do, yet on the off chance that a human causes a mistake we to can adjust and make the vital upgrades to make the mistake better or find the correct solution. Thomas expresses that PCs are intended to be great, notwithstanding, as we as a whole know from individual encounters, PCs once in a while do make mistakes.He then proceeds to state that PCs come do likewise as people, similar to when individuals commit errors they gain from them, he said that in the event that PCs could do it they would be considerably progressively great, at that point expressed. Thomas utilizes the component of symbolism to catch his perusers enthusiasm for the exposition, by contrasting a people mind with a PC's operations, he proceeds to express that a decent bank or the administration, needs to run like a PC or a least to some degree, this associates the peruser to something that goes on in regular day to day existence and moves their live along.In this paper Thomas' proposed it to cause perusers to understand that a â€Å"error† is not something to be stressed over and it really could be are most noteworthy quality. His convincing strategies and the entirety of his ground-breaking symbolism and depiction cause this paper to convince anybody to agree with his stance and make it seem as though PCs aren't generally that ideal at long last.

Two Commonly Confused Words (Very Really)

Two Commonly Confused Words (Very Really) EP 32: English Grammar 101: Two Commonly Confused Words (Very Really) EP 32: English Grammar 101: Two Commonly Confused Words (Very Really) This week we continue our weekly mini series. We are investigating the foundations of English grammar, starting with the basics and moving on from there. This week we discuss two commonly confused words in the English language: very and really. Join Cath Anne as she wraps up our short series on the foundations of English grammar. Looking for study tips, help with essay writing, or advice on how to be a better student? Welcome to The Homework Help Show, a weekly show where we teach, assist, and offer valuable insights for student life. From study hacks to writing tips, discussions about student mental health to step-by-step guides on academic writing and how to write a resume, weve got you covered. Want your questions answered? Write them below or join the conversation on social media using the hashtag #askHHG TRANSCRIPT: Cath Anne: [00:00:06] Im Cath Anne and welcome back to our channel. Here on The Homework Help Show we provide you with valuable content for your academic and student life. Just a quick reminder before we jump into the content this week. Every Monday at 7:00p.m. EST, you can join me on Instagram. Ill be doing a quick chat and a Live video just to check with you guys and see how your classes are going and to remind you of our upcoming videos. I love to chat with you guys so make sure you join us. Add us on Instagram and join me Live every Monday at 7:00 pm EST. Cath Anne: [00:00:45] This week we are returning to our Grammar 101 series for the final episode and were going to talk about the difference between two words that often get confused in the English language which are really and very. Sometimes these words can get confused and can be difficult to know when to use really and when to use very. Today Im going to give you a quick explanation that will hopefully help clarify things for you and help you to know when to use really and when to use very. Cath Anne: [00:01:19] Though this might seem really basic, these tips can be helpful for anyone even if you are native English speaker. It always helps to go back to the foundation of the language and re-learn a few of these skills. So, if youre interested please follow along and join me in our discussion. Cath Anne: [00:01:41] OK lets get started. So, first there is one thing in common that both of these words do. Really and very are both used to add intensity or emphasis to what you are saying. Both of them have the same effect. Really and very they both have the same effect of emphasizing words. Cath Anne: [00:02:03] So, lets begin with really. Really is used to modify, to add emphasis, to change, verbs, adjectives and adverbs. So, it works with all three of these types of words. Cath Anne: [00:02:19] We can also use it. So, yeah, we can use modify verbs, we can use it to modify adjectives and adverbs. Now, lets move into a couple of examples. For example, The kitten is really silly. In this sentence, silly is an adjective; we use really before the adjective to modify. So, this gives emphasis to the word silly. He runs really quickly, is another sentence. The word quickly is actually adverb and we add really to add emphasis to quickly he runs. Here I have written, Youre really funny. Funny is being modified here, and that is an adjective and we are using the word really to modify it and emphasize how funny that person is. It must be that person thats telling you all those silly jokes all the time. Cath Anne: [00:03:22] We can also say Im really tired. Tired here is an adjective. So, we use the word really to emphasize how tired I am. Maybe youre feeling this at the mid-point in the semester when tests and essays are ramping up. We can use really to modify verbs and we can also use it to modify adjectives and adverbs as we have discussed. Cath Anne: [00:03:49] Now we will talk a little bit about how we use really to modify verbs in just a little bit. Move over to the sentences. We just gave you some examples of where it modifies adjectives and adverbs so far but we will talk about the verbs in a little bit. Cath Anne: [00:04:06] So, moving on to very. Very is a bit different. It is used to modify adjectives and adverbs only. You can not use the word very to modify verbs. Cath Anne: [00:04:17] Generally, we use very in negative sentences, So that can give me a sense of when to use very if youre confused between the two words. If it is a negative sentence, generally youll use very because it just allows the sentence to flow a little bit better. We will talk a little bit more about that. Lets take a look at a few examples. Cath Anne: [00:04:43] Here we have, The sandwich is very good. Good is an adjective and we are using very to modify the word good. Youre not very funny. Maybe this is the person that tells you all the puns all the time. Very is modifying the word funny which is an adjective again in a sentence. And also youre not is negative sentence. It is a negative statement. Cath Anne: [00:05:11] So, you could say not really funny. Youre not really funny. Cath Anne: [00:05:16] But, this just doesnt have the same flow to it doesnt sound as natural as Youre not very funny. So, here we would use the word very. Cath Anne: [00:05:28] He doesnt run very quickly. Here we have another negative sentence. Adding very in this sentence adds emphasis to how not quickly he runs. So, again we are using it in a negative sentence. Theyre very rich. They are very rich. You could say theyre really rich. But, as you can see it doesnt have the same ring to it. So, we prefer to use the word very, but in this sentence you could use very or really. Cath Anne: [00:06:01] OK. Lets take a look at a few example sentences. In particular I want point out times where we will be using the word really to modify verbs and we will discuss a little bit more about using very in a negative sentence. Cath Anne: [00:06:18] Lets take a look. So, in our first example sentence we have, They *blank* love pizza. Here we are modifying the word love and love is a verb. So we will use the word really. They really love pizza. The restaurant wasnt *blank* good. So, here we have the word wasnt which implies a negative sentence. So, we have the word, wasnt which implies a negative sentence. So, The restaurant wasnt very good.. Cath Anne: [00:07:15] Then we have It is *blank* rainy today. Now, in this sentence we could use the word really or the word very. They both work in this sentence. It is really rainy today. Rainy is an adverb so we can use either one of these. Cath Anne: [00:07:43] He *blank* eats a lot. Here we are modifying the word eats, which is a verb, so here would use the word really. He really eats a lot. As you can see if we tried to use the word very it wouldnt make sense. He very eats a lot is not a correct sentence. So we will prefer to use the word really. Cath Anne: [00:08:19] I *blank* hope we can catch up soon. Here we are modifying the word hope which is a verb. So we use the word really. I really hope we can catch up soon. Finally, we have, He doesnt eat *blank* much. Doesnt, again we have a negative word. So, here we will use the word very. Cath Anne: [00:08:57] Ok. Thats a quick overview of when to use really and when to use very. Remember, can you can use really in front of a verb and if you are making a negative statement use the word very instead of really. It just makes the sentence flow and sound a bit more natural. Cath Anne: [00:09:22] OK. So, I hope that was a benefit to you. If you do have any questions please leave them in the comments below. Feel free to DM us on Instagram, or anywhere that you find us. Next week we will be discussing study methods and how you can incorporate that into your study routine. So, Im really excited for that one. If you did like this video and you want to see more of our content, make sure that you click like, give us a thumbs up and make sure to subscribe to our channel. We also have many other platforms where we are linked. We are doing podcasts, we are doing the video here on YouTube and we are also on many other platforms like Medium we write lots of blogs. So, all of that social media information is in the description box below for your viewing pleasure. Youre free to connect anywhere on those platforms. Yeah, so it would really help us if you guys would like and subscribe to our channel to keep in the loop. Thats it for me this week guys. I hope to talk to you soon. I hope this video was of benefit. Take care. Two Commonly Confused Words (Very Really) EP 32: English Grammar 101: Two Commonly Confused Words (Very Really) EP 32: English Grammar 101: Two Commonly Confused Words (Very Really) This week we continue our weekly mini series. We are investigating the foundations of English grammar, starting with the basics and moving on from there. This week we discuss two commonly confused words in the English language: very and really. Join Cath Anne as she wraps up our short series on the foundations of English grammar. Looking for study tips, help with essay writing, or advice on how to be a better student? Welcome to The Homework Help Show, a weekly show where we teach, assist, and offer valuable insights for student life. From study hacks to writing tips, discussions about student mental health to step-by-step guides on academic writing and how to write a resume, weve got you covered. Want your questions answered? Write them below or join the conversation on social media using the hashtag #askHHG TRANSCRIPT: Cath Anne: [00:00:06] Im Cath Anne and welcome back to our channel. Here on The Homework Help Show we provide you with valuable content for your academic and student life. Just a quick reminder before we jump into the content this week. Every Monday at 7:00p.m. EST, you can join me on Instagram. Ill be doing a quick chat and a Live video just to check with you guys and see how your classes are going and to remind you of our upcoming videos. I love to chat with you guys so make sure you join us. Add us on Instagram and join me Live every Monday at 7:00 pm EST. Cath Anne: [00:00:45] This week we are returning to our Grammar 101 series for the final episode and were going to talk about the difference between two words that often get confused in the English language which are really and very. Sometimes these words can get confused and can be difficult to know when to use really and when to use very. Today Im going to give you a quick explanation that will hopefully help clarify things for you and help you to know when to use really and when to use very. Cath Anne: [00:01:19] Though this might seem really basic, these tips can be helpful for anyone even if you are native English speaker. It always helps to go back to the foundation of the language and re-learn a few of these skills. So, if youre interested please follow along and join me in our discussion. Cath Anne: [00:01:41] OK lets get started. So, first there is one thing in common that both of these words do. Really and very are both used to add intensity or emphasis to what you are saying. Both of them have the same effect. Really and very they both have the same effect of emphasizing words. Cath Anne: [00:02:03] So, lets begin with really. Really is used to modify, to add emphasis, to change, verbs, adjectives and adverbs. So, it works with all three of these types of words. Cath Anne: [00:02:19] We can also use it. So, yeah, we can use modify verbs, we can use it to modify adjectives and adverbs. Now, lets move into a couple of examples. For example, The kitten is really silly. In this sentence, silly is an adjective; we use really before the adjective to modify. So, this gives emphasis to the word silly. He runs really quickly, is another sentence. The word quickly is actually adverb and we add really to add emphasis to quickly he runs. Here I have written, Youre really funny. Funny is being modified here, and that is an adjective and we are using the word really to modify it and emphasize how funny that person is. It must be that person thats telling you all those silly jokes all the time. Cath Anne: [00:03:22] We can also say Im really tired. Tired here is an adjective. So, we use the word really to emphasize how tired I am. Maybe youre feeling this at the mid-point in the semester when tests and essays are ramping up. We can use really to modify verbs and we can also use it to modify adjectives and adverbs as we have discussed. Cath Anne: [00:03:49] Now we will talk a little bit about how we use really to modify verbs in just a little bit. Move over to the sentences. We just gave you some examples of where it modifies adjectives and adverbs so far but we will talk about the verbs in a little bit. Cath Anne: [00:04:06] So, moving on to very. Very is a bit different. It is used to modify adjectives and adverbs only. You can not use the word very to modify verbs. Cath Anne: [00:04:17] Generally, we use very in negative sentences, So that can give me a sense of when to use very if youre confused between the two words. If it is a negative sentence, generally youll use very because it just allows the sentence to flow a little bit better. We will talk a little bit more about that. Lets take a look at a few examples. Cath Anne: [00:04:43] Here we have, The sandwich is very good. Good is an adjective and we are using very to modify the word good. Youre not very funny. Maybe this is the person that tells you all the puns all the time. Very is modifying the word funny which is an adjective again in a sentence. And also youre not is negative sentence. It is a negative statement. Cath Anne: [00:05:11] So, you could say not really funny. Youre not really funny. Cath Anne: [00:05:16] But, this just doesnt have the same flow to it doesnt sound as natural as Youre not very funny. So, here we would use the word very. Cath Anne: [00:05:28] He doesnt run very quickly. Here we have another negative sentence. Adding very in this sentence adds emphasis to how not quickly he runs. So, again we are using it in a negative sentence. Theyre very rich. They are very rich. You could say theyre really rich. But, as you can see it doesnt have the same ring to it. So, we prefer to use the word very, but in this sentence you could use very or really. Cath Anne: [00:06:01] OK. Lets take a look at a few example sentences. In particular I want point out times where we will be using the word really to modify verbs and we will discuss a little bit more about using very in a negative sentence. Cath Anne: [00:06:18] Lets take a look. So, in our first example sentence we have, They *blank* love pizza. Here we are modifying the word love and love is a verb. So we will use the word really. They really love pizza. The restaurant wasnt *blank* good. So, here we have the word wasnt which implies a negative sentence. So, we have the word, wasnt which implies a negative sentence. So, The restaurant wasnt very good.. Cath Anne: [00:07:15] Then we have It is *blank* rainy today. Now, in this sentence we could use the word really or the word very. They both work in this sentence. It is really rainy today. Rainy is an adverb so we can use either one of these. Cath Anne: [00:07:43] He *blank* eats a lot. Here we are modifying the word eats, which is a verb, so here would use the word really. He really eats a lot. As you can see if we tried to use the word very it wouldnt make sense. He very eats a lot is not a correct sentence. So we will prefer to use the word really. Cath Anne: [00:08:19] I *blank* hope we can catch up soon. Here we are modifying the word hope which is a verb. So we use the word really. I really hope we can catch up soon. Finally, we have, He doesnt eat *blank* much. Doesnt, again we have a negative word. So, here we will use the word very. Cath Anne: [00:08:57] Ok. Thats a quick overview of when to use really and when to use very. Remember, can you can use really in front of a verb and if you are making a negative statement use the word very instead of really. It just makes the sentence flow and sound a bit more natural. Cath Anne: [00:09:22] OK. So, I hope that was a benefit to you. If you do have any questions please leave them in the comments below. Feel free to DM us on Instagram, or anywhere that you find us. Next week we will be discussing study methods and how you can incorporate that into your study routine. So, Im really excited for that one. If you did like this video and you want to see more of our content, make sure that you click like, give us a thumbs up and make sure to subscribe to our channel. We also have many other platforms where we are linked. We are doing podcasts, we are doing the video here on YouTube and we are also on many other platforms like Medium we write lots of blogs. So, all of that social media information is in the description box below for your viewing pleasure. Youre free to connect anywhere on those platforms. Yeah, so it would really help us if you guys would like and subscribe to our channel to keep in the loop. Thats it for me this week guys. I hope to talk to you soon. I hope this video was of benefit. Take care.

Comparable Worth Compared to Equal Pay

Comparable worth is shorthand for equal pay for work of equal value or equal pay for work of comparable worth. The doctrine of comparable worth is an attempt to remedy the inequities of pay which result from a long history of sex-segregated jobs and different pay scales for female and male jobs. Market rates, in this view, reflect past discriminatory practices, and cannot be the only basis of deciding current pay equity. Comparable worth looks at the skills and responsibilities of different jobs and attempts to correlate compensation to those skills and responsibilities. Comparable worth systems seek to fairly compensate jobs held primarily by women or by men more equitably by comparing the educational and skill requirements, task activities, and responsibility in different jobs, and attempting to compensate each job in relation to such factors rather than by the traditional pay history of the jobs. Equal Pay vs. Comparable Worth The Equal Pay Act of 1973  and many court decisions on pay equity revolve around the requirement that  the work being compared be equal work.  This approach to equity assumes that there are men and women in the job category and that they should not be paid differently for doing the same work. What happens when jobs are distributed differently, where there are different jobs, some held traditionally by mostly men and some held traditionally by mostly women?  How does equal pay for equal work apply? The effect of the ghettos of male and female jobs is that often, the male jobs were traditionally compensated more highly in part because they were held by men, and the female jobs were compensated less well in part because they were held by women. The comparable value approach then moves to looking at the work itself: What skills are required? How much training and education? What level of responsibility is involved? Example Traditionally, the job of a licensed practical nurse has been held mostly by women, and the job of a licensed electrician mostly by men.  If the skills and responsibilities and required training levels are found to be relatively equal, then a compensation system involving both jobs would adjust compensation to bring the LPNs pay into line with the electricians pay. A common example in a large organization, like state employees, might be outdoor lawn maintenance compared to nursery school aides.  The former has traditionally been done more by men and the latter by women.  The level of responsibility and education required is higher for the nursery school aides, and lifting small children may be similar to lifting requirements for those maintaining the lawn who lift bags of soil and other materials. Yet traditionally, the nursery school aides were paid less than the lawn maintenance crew, probably because of the historical connections of the jobs with men (once assumed to be breadwinners) and women (once assumed to be earning pin money).  Is the responsibility for a lawn of more value than the responsibility for the education and welfare of small children? The Effect of Comparable Worth Adjustments By using more objective standards applied to otherwise-different jobs, the effect is usually to increase pay to the jobs where women dominate in numbers. Often, the effect is also to equalize pay across racial lines as well, where jobs had been distributed differently by race. In most actual implementations of comparable worth, the pay of the lower-paid group is adjusted upwards, and the pay of the higher-paid group is allowed to grow more slowly than it would have without the comparable worth system in place.  It is not common practice in such implementations for the higher-paid group to have their wages or salaries cut from current levels. Where Comparable Worth Is Used Most comparable worth agreements have been the result of labor union negotiations or other agreements  and are more likely to be in the public sector than the private sector. The approach lends itself better to large organizations, whether public or private and has little effect on such jobs as domestic workers, where few people work in each workplace. The union AFSCME (American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees) has been particularly active in winning comparable worth agreements. Opponents of comparable worth generally argue for the difficulty of judging true worth of a job, and for allowing the market forces to balance a variety of social values. Bibliography Linda M. Blum. Between Feminism and Labor: The Significance of the Comparable Worth Movement. 1991.Sara M. Evans, Barbara N. Nelson. Wage Justice: Comparable Worth and the Paradox of Technocratic Reform. 1989, 1991.Joan Acker. Doing Comparable Worth: Gender, Class, and Pay Equity. 1989, 1991.Helen Remick. Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination. 1984, 1985.

What Is a Compound Adjective

A compound adjective is made up of two or more words (such as part-time  and  high-speed) that act as a single idea to modify a noun (a part-time employee, a high-speed chase). Also called a  phrasal adjective or a  compound modifier. As a general rule, the words in a compound adjective are hyphenated when they come before a noun (a well-known actor) but not when they come after (The actor is well known). Also, compound adjectives formed with an adverb ending in -ly (such as rapidly changing) are usually not hyphenated. Examples and Observations You know, everybody thinks we found this broken-down horse and fixed him, but we didnt. He fixed us.If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.The general was meeting someone for dinner at an out-of-the-way restaurant, not in the suburb of Nanterre, but close by.A well-developed sense of humor is the pole that adds balance to your steps as you walk the tightrope of life.​  (William Arthur Ward) Hyphenation With Compound Adjectives Interestingly, hyphenation is also used creatively to indicate that an idea that would normally be expressed by a phrase is being treated as a single word for communicative purposes because it has crystallized in the writers mind into a firm, single concept. Thus, for example, the expression simple to serve is normally a phrase, just like easy to control. But it can also be used as a hyphenated word as in simple-to-serve recipe dishes... (MS Magazine 1992) Adverbs that do not end in -ly may take the hyphen to form a compound adjective. The reason is obvious. A fast-moving script suggests a roller-coaster plot while a fast-moving script might have pace but it is emotionally charged (i.e., emotionally moving) at the same time. ​​The Lighter Side of Compound Adjectives: Laser-Focused Will somebody explain to me why every focus is now laser-focused? Lasers can guide, ignite, heat, drive, and print, but focus? This is the hottest compound adjective around today, leaving all other focuses fuzzy. In Enrons 2000 annual report, the company claimed to be laser-focused on earnings per share, at which point I should have become suspicious. Also Known As Phrasal adjective, unit modifier, compound modifier Sources Seabiscuit, 2003Stephen Fry as General Melchett in Private Plane.  Blackadder Goes Forth, 1989Robert Ludlum,  The Bourne Identity. Richard Marek Publishers, 1980Bruce Grundy,  So You Want to be a Journalist?  Cambridge University Press, 2007William Safire,  The Right Word in the Right Place at the Right Time. Simon Schuster, 2004

What is the role of hedge funds in the financial market Free Essays

There has been rapid growth in the number of edge funds and their assets under management, suggesting they provide economic value to investors that is not available in other investment instruments. Their main aim is to reduce risk and volatility whilst attempting to preserve capital and deliver positive returns under all market conditions. They used a range of aggressive methods to invest in a wide array of assets to generate returns which have a very low correlation with traditional asset classes, creating a diversifying effect on a portfolio. We will write a custom essay sample on What is the role of hedge funds in the financial market or any similar topic only for you Order Now This means they get a constant level of return, regardless of what the market does. Hedge funds tend to be illiquid as investors are limited in terms of when and how much money they are able to take out, therefore they are long term propositions. Originally, hedge funds were not subject to the public disclosure or regulatory reporting requirements that apply to other financial institutions, thus they had little or no regulatory oversight. But since the financial crisis, more regulations have been introduced, such as reporting under AIFMD; The Alternative Investment Funds Managers Directive. Also, from February 2014, they will have to report under Emir. Policy director in the BBA’s Capital Market and Infrastructure division, Andrew Rogan, recently said â€Å"If [funds] don’t comply with Emir, there are real consequences to how a business can use derivatives to protect itself from risk†¦ and you may even be shut out of the market completely. † The purpose of regulation is to protect investors. Although an element of secrecy between funds is kept in order to keep investment strategies to themselves, they can’t do whatever they like with other peoples’ money, so regulation had to be introduced. Markets function best when investors use ifferent information and strategies to manage, or hedge against, risk. Private investment companies provide valuable liquidity to financial markets in normal market conditions. In â€Å"Hands Off Hedge Funds†, Sebastian Mallaby states that â€Å"by buying irrationally cheap assets and selling irrationally expensive ones, they shift market prices until the irrationalities disappear, thus ultimately facilitating the efficient allocation of the world’s capital. † (Mallaby, 2007). Consequently, hedge funds can be less volatile than individual stocks or mutual funds. With the freedom to nvest wherever the managers believe they can perform better than the market, hedge funds broaden the use of investment strategies, increasing the number of investors, and enlarging the capital pools available and strengthening capital markets. Through flexibility, they are able to trade different securities in several markets at once, so opportunities for returns are maximised, improving risk management and encouraging innovation ot strategies, as well as financial products and services. There is also a competitive advantage as hedge funds attract human nd financial capital, contributing to a stronger economy. They can act as an incentive for businesses and individuals to invest because they offer the chance for money to be invested in a range of products, free from fraud and over-regulation, and increases in investment can influence economic growth and stability. Hedge funds also improve the efficiency of capital markets by helping to price securities more accurately. This minimizes market distortions, which in turn leads to better allocation of capital, financing growth, innovation and Job creation. Short selling, for example, may be a technique used by hedge funds and is sometimes seen as playing an essential part of the price discovery mechanism. Some researchers believe short interest is an indicator of poor stock performance, and that short sellers exploit market mistakes. Hedge funds have many different benefits such as diversification, flexibility and liquidity, but to the larger financial system they can provide innovation, reduction of mispricing, gains in both growth and employment, and the provision of capital for technological and economic development. How to cite What is the role of hedge funds in the financial market, Papers

an eye for an eye Essay Example For Students

an eye for an eye Essay An Eye For An EyeBoth detectives held a gun, but neither of them could shoot at Richards. The gunman was hiding closely behind his hostage and exposing little of his body to them. Smith knew he couldnt risk a shot. There were too many people in the tavern, and most of them were behind Richards. He might hit one of them if he missed the gunman. And he probably would miss. The target being offered to him was much too small. Smith glanced at his partner, Mary Scott. She was a very good shot. She was capable of hitting a small target at this range. She was the departments pistol champion, and she could consistently hit a quarter at thirty feet with the gun she carried. But she was in an awkward position at the moment. There were several people between her and Richards. She needed time to get around them. But she was slowly weaving her way through the crowd and moving closer to the ex-con who was holding a gun to the old mans head. If she could get into a better position, and if Richards gave her even the smallest target, she would put him down. Smith realized that he had to buy her some time. He had to keep Richards occupied until she was in the clear. He spoke soothingly to the gunman. Richards, youve killed one man already tonight. Dont make it worse by doing it again. That wiseguy had it coming, Richards responded. If he hadnt made me mad, I wouldnt have killed him. Maybe we can make a deal, Smith said. If you surrender now, Ill tell the judge that you said you did it only because you were angry. No, Richards shouted. No deals. If I have any business with you, itll be to blow you away. Smith glanced at his partner again. She needed only a few more seconds. Richards, we dont want to shoot you, we only want to help you. Tell me how we can do that. Just let me take a shot at you. If youll let me do that without shooting back, Ill be satisfied. When Mary Scott reached the pool table, she looked at Richards. She was now within ten feet of him, and no one stood betwee n them except the hostage. She assessed her chances of hitting Richards at that range. It would be easy if only a little more of his head was showing. But he wasnt exposing his head to her, and thats where she had to place the shot. If she hit him anywhere else, he might pull the trigger before he died. If he did that, the old man would also die. There was a terrible stillness as Richards shifted his eyes between Mike Smith and Mary Scott. He did it slowly. He sensed that if he moved too quickly, or did the wrong thing, one of these cops would risk taking a shot at him. He started to back toward the door, dragging his hostage with him. Smith looked at Richards over the sights of his gun and said, Dont do it, Richards. Its a fools move. If youll just drop the gun, no one will be hurt. I promise you that. Richards grinned. Drop dead. The old man was terrified. He didnt say a word as the ex-con pulled him toward the door, but his eyes begged the two cops to do something anything to s ave him. As Richards inched toward the door, Smith and Scott followed. The gunman looked at Mary and swore. Ill kill this guy if either of you come any closer, he said. Mary responded. Dont do that, Richards. If you kill him, well drop you on the spot. Richards laughed strangely. All I want to do is get outta here. If you dont let me do that, Ill kill all of you. Mary looked at the crowd. Everyone was nervous. A few of them were close to panic. One woman was anxiously looking toward the door, and Mary thought she might run toward it at any moment. Mary didnt want her to do that. If she did, everyone in .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 , .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .postImageUrl , .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 , .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313:hover , .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313:visited , .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313:active { border:0!important; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313:active , .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313 .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u86d1c5999b11ad3ab4e56b0ead0c2313:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Love Song Of J. Alfred Prufrock Essay Thesis